Comparison

Roam isn't competing with your reviewer.

Semantic reviewers (CodeRabbit, Greptile, Qodo) read what the code does. Roam reads what it touches. Most teams keep their semantic reviewer and add Roam alongside.

Roam compared with CodeRabbit, Greptile, Qodo, and SonarQube on nine product axes.
Roam CodeRabbit Greptile Qodo SonarQube
Reviews what the code touches (callers, layers, cycles) Yes Limited Limited Limited Yes
Reviews what the code does (semantics) Limited Yes Yes Yes Limited
Catches the clone-not-edited bug AI keeps shipping Yes Not advertised Not advertised Not advertised Not advertised
Runs locally — source never uploaded Yes Cloud* Cloud* Cloud* Yes (paid)
Publishes EU AI Act Article 12 evidence pack Yes Not advertised Not advertised Not advertised Not advertised
MCP server for AI agents Yes (136 tools) Not advertised Not advertised Not advertised Not advertised
Open source Apache 2.0 No No No Community ed.
Free tier for individuals Yes, forever Trial Trial Trial Community ed.
Starting price (team tier) $25/dev/mo $24/dev/mo** $30/seat/mo + usage $30/user/mo from $32/mo (LOC-based)

*self-host available on Enterprise tiers; **annual billing.

Methodology

Every cell in this table is a verifiable claim. Where we say "Limited" or "Not advertised", we mean we could not find the capability documented on the vendor's public pages as of the verification date below. If you're a vendor and we got something wrong, email [email protected] and we'll update.

Sources verified 2026-05-07

How we mark each cell

  • Yes — capability documented on the vendor's marketing or docs page
  • Limited — partial capability documented, or the capability appears on enterprise-only or undocumented surfaces
  • Not advertised — we could not find the capability documented; this is verifiable via vendor pages above

Why "alongside", not "instead of"

Semantic and structural review answer different questions. Semantic review (CodeRabbit, Greptile, Qodo) reads the diff as text and asks: does this change make sense semantically? Are there bugs in the logic?. Structural review (Roam) reads the diff as a graph mutation and asks: what else does this touch? What's the blast radius? Are there clones we should also update?. Most production-quality engineering teams want both signals.

That's why our pricing assumes you keep your existing reviewer: $25/dev/mo for Roam Review is additive to $24-30 for the semantic reviewer, not a replacement.

Want to evaluate Roam alongside your current reviewer?

We'll set up a free 30-day pilot in your repo, run the existing reviewer and Roam in parallel, and quantify which findings each one caught that the other missed. Email [email protected].